The Middle Ground
79
The Place For Transpartisan Politics, Where We Invite You To Be Wise, Be Strong, and Be Heard!
Follow
Scooped by Michael Charney onto The Middle Ground
Scoop.it!

6 Great Books About Money In Politics - Slide Show

6 Great Books About Money In Politics - Slide Show | The Middle Ground | Scoop.it

Should Super PACs be allowed to do as they please? Or should their be a limit on private citizen spending for campaigns? Should these citizens be protected under the First Amendment (free speech) or not?


These are difficult questions to answer, but some of these books might help you get there.

No comment yet.
Michael Charney is also curating
The 535 Campaign Tea With The Mad Hatter Electile Dysfunction
Discover Topics Michael Charney is following
Coffee Party News The Middle Ground The Bottom Line Coffee Party Feminists Coffee Party TV Crowdfunding
and 43 others
Your new post is loading...
Scooped by Michael Charney
Scoop.it!

Time to Abolish Right vs Left

Time to Abolish Right vs Left | The Middle Ground | Scoop.it

by CARL GIBSON


Keeping our nation divided as right vs left is an agenda supported by both Fox News and MSNBC. The media and the politicians both profit from Americans believing they should hate their fellow Americans. And oddly enough, the one thing that unites the traditional “right” and “left” in this country is our hatred for those same media organizations and politicians that make money by regularly lying to us. The best way to beat them is to find the things that bring us together in one common purpose and unite around that.


An article in the Atlantic last week talked about how the dominant liberal narrative is broken. The argument that government is inherently good and is necessary to provide things like Social Security, Medicare and national parks has some truth to it, and worked well for both parties in the mid-twentieth century. Democrats and Republicans from FDR to Eisenhower won landslide elections using the good-government narrative. But now that our government is captive to corporations and their lobbyists like the US Chamber of Commerce, Americans of all ideological leanings are united in the belief that our current government, as it stands, is completely out of touch and needs radical change from outside the political system to do it. MORE


No comment yet.
Scooped by Michael Charney
Scoop.it!

The Real GMO Wars

The Real GMO Wars | The Middle Ground | Scoop.it

by MICHAEL CHARNEY


Monsanto’s latest brainstorm is still another genetically modified soybean, this one developed (with BASF) in response to “an explosion of crop-choking weeds around the U.S. that have become resistant” to the most recent round of Round-up, Monsanto’s best-selling herbicide. The weeds, it seems are smarter—and faster—than our best scientists....


MORE


No comment yet.
Scooped by Michael Charney
Scoop.it!

Conservative comic says joke’s on liberals (with Video)

Conservative comic says joke’s on liberals (with Video) | The Middle Ground | Scoop.it

by PATRICK GAVIN (Politico)


You have your Jon Stewarts and Bill Mahers on the left, but what about the world of conservative comedy?


Eric Golub, 41, is on the road 300 days a year performing anyplace that will have him, whether tea party rallies or Republican women’s groups, and he boasts on his website that he is “the country’s preeminent politically conservative comedian.”


He says conservative comedians are “in the closet, so they’re starting to come out.” And he wants to reject the idea that conservatives aren’t funny.


“Conservatives are often seen as stuffed shirts, and that’s unfair,” Golub said. “I tell those people, go to a College Republicans Saturday night bash. You will not see stuffed shirts.”


But, even if liberal comedians occupy most of the air in the room, Golub is hardly bitter.


“To blame Hollywood liberalism — which does exist — is an excuse,” Golub told POLITICO. “Maybe some of the conservatives that are trying are just not that talented.” Golub also says he’s never been blacklisted for his views.


No comment yet.
Suggested by Greg Russak
Scoop.it!

The Real IRS Scandal

The Real IRS Scandal | The Middle Ground | Scoop.it

by LOUISE HARTMANN (Thom Hartmann)


Yesterday, in response to recent IRS admissions, President Obama called the enhanced investigation of conservative groups seeking tax-exempt status “intolerable and inexcusable.”  And, Attorney General Eric Holder announced a criminal investigation into the allegations against the IRS.  But both of them are missing the point.  

The scandal here is not that political groups were targeted by the IRS, it's the fact that political groups are being subsidized by John Q. Taxpayer.  Groups that are politically motivated, and not really “social welfare” organizations, shouldn't receive preferential tax treatment in the first place – regardless of their political affiliation. MORE


No comment yet.
Scooped by Michael Charney
Scoop.it!

IRS tea party scandal: How bad for Obama? (+video)

IRS tea party scandal: How bad for Obama? (+video) | The Middle Ground | Scoop.it

by PETER GRIER (Christian Science Monitor)

 

The Internal Revenue Service applied special scrutiny to applications for tax-exempt status from tea party and other conservative groups, according to a draft inspector general’s report obtained by the Associated Press.

 

IRS officials on Friday apologized for what they said was “inappropriate” targeting of such organizations in the 2012 election. They blamed low-level employees in the tax agency’s Cincinnati office, which handles most applications for tax-exempt 501(c)(4) status.

 

But contrary to IRS public statements, senior officials at the agency knew of such targeting as early as June 2011, according to the document obtained by AP. And the IRS looked especially hard at applicants who “criticize how the country is run” or who sought to educate the public on ways “to make America a better place to live,” says a CNN report.... MORE

 

No comment yet.
Scooped by Michael Charney
Scoop.it!

BREAKING: Retail sales edge up, show some strength in economy

BREAKING: Retail sales edge up, show some strength in economy | The Middle Ground | Scoop.it

(Reuters) - Retail sales unexpectedly rose in April as households bought automobiles, building materials and a range of other goods, pointing to underlying strength in the economy.

 

The Commerce Department said on Monday retail sales edged up 0.1 percent after a revised 0.5 percent decline in March.

Economists polled by Reuters had expected retail sales, which account for about 30 percent of consumer spending, to drop 0.3 percent last month after a previously reported 0.4 percent decline in March.

 

So-called core sales, which strip out automobiles, gasoline and building materials and correspond most closely with the consumer spending component of gross domestic product, increased 0.5 percent after nudging up 0.1 percent in March.

 

The increase in core sales, coming on the heel of relatively strong job growth over the last three months, should help to ally fears of an abrupt slowdown in the economy early in the second quarter even as government austerity is starting to put a strain on manufacturing.

 

The tone of the retail sales report was mostly firm. Receipts at auto dealerships rose 1.0 percent after falling 0.6 percent in March. Excluding autos, sales dipped 0.1 percent after falling 0.4 percent in March.

 

Though falling gasoline prices pushed down receipts at gasoline stations, sales excluding gasoline recorded their largest increase since December.

Stripping out gasoline and autos, sales rose 0.6 percent.

 

Sales at building materials and garden equipment suppliers increased 1.5 percent, the largest gain since September. That reflects gains in homebuilding as the housing market recovery gains momentum.

 

Receipts at clothing stores rose 1.2 percent, the biggest increase since February last year.

 

Sales at sporting goods, hobby, book and music stores gained 0.5 percent. Receipts at electronics and appliances stores increased 0.8 percent, while sales at furniture stores were flat.

 

No comment yet.
Scooped by Michael Charney
Scoop.it!

Political Intelligence: Transparency or Insider Trading?

Political Intelligence: Transparency or Insider Trading? | The Middle Ground | Scoop.it

by John Light


There are many ways corporations and financial interests can exercise influence in Washington. Some donate money to political campaigns while others hire lobbyists to be their megaphones to legislator ears. But information flows the other way, too. And since the financial crisis, details about the laws and regulations being hashed out behind closed doors is more valuable than ever.


A story from the Washington Post this week looks at the growing popularity of “political intelligence” firms that sell analysis of federal actions, and the likely policy ramifications of those actions, to interested parties. Oftentimes, the clients are investors in a company that will be affected by a policy decision or a proposed regulation. Some firms even coordinate meetings and conference calls with congressional staff members in which they share what they know about relevant legislation.


The Post illustrates this with an example: Capitol Street, a political intelligence firm specializing in health policy, recently set up a private conference call between a member of Sen. Orrin Hatch’s staff (R-Utah) and investors in Humana, a major healthcare company. The staffer told the investors that the odds were improving that Congress would make a decision related to Medicare that would help insurance companies. That same morning, the level of speculative trading on Humana’s stock was nearly 10 times more than it had been on any day in the previous two weeks. Lawmakers and federal regulators have noted that this sort of politically informed investing can look suspicious, and investigators recently issued subpoenas in connection with a different spike in trading after a D.C.-based investment-research firm correctly predicted a change in policy.


MORE


Tom Hauck's curator insight, May 14, 3:45 PM

How did you think politicians get so rich...so fast...?

Scooped by Michael Charney
Scoop.it!

When Myths Collide in the Capital

When Myths Collide in the Capital | The Middle Ground | Scoop.it

by MAUREEN DOWD (NY Times)

 

THE capital is in the throes of déjà vu and preview as it plunges back into Clinton Rules, defined by a presidential aide on the hit ABC show “Scandal” as damage control that goes like this: “It’s not true, it’s not true, it’s not true, it’s old news.”

 

The conservatives appearing on Benghazi-obsessed Fox News are a damage patrol with an approach that goes like this: “Lies, paranoia, subpoena, impeach, Watergate, Iran-contra.”

 

(Though now that the I.R.S. has confessed to targeting Tea Party groups, maybe some of the paranoia is justified.)

 

Welcome to a glorious spring weekend of accusation and obfuscation as Hillaryland goes up against Foxworld.

 

The toxic theatrics, including Karl Rove’s first attack ad against Hillary, cloud a simple truth: The administration’s behavior before and during the attack in Benghazi, in which four Americans died, was unworthy of the greatest power on earth.

 

MORE

 

No comment yet.
Rescooped by Michael Charney from Speaking of America
Scoop.it!

Immigration reform advances, Heritage on defense

Immigration reform advances, Heritage on defense | The Middle Ground | Scoop.it

Excerpt from column by Jennifer Rubin, Washington Post

 

...The Heritage Foundation is in a tailspin. To Politico and then to me, Heritage’s vice president of of communications, Mike Gonzales, denied that he or Heritage has hired acrisis management firm. If not, Heritage should. More details about the unsavory work of one of its anti-immigration report authors are coming to light. Chris Moody reports: “Heritage Foundation analyst Jason Richwine, the co-author of a study claiming the immigration reform bill pending in the Senate would cost taxpayers $6.3 trillion, wrote two articles in 2010 for a website founded by Richard Spencer, a self-described ‘nationalist’ who writes frequently about race and against “the abstract notion of human equality.”


Another report suggests that “Richwine is not the only scholar conservative immigration opponents in the current debate have relied on and who’ve published eyebrow-raising views in the past. The Heritage Richwine snafu will bring fresh scrutiny to other scholars, immigration advocates said.”

Former vice president of research Burton Pines is also denouncing Heritage’s work. He is quoted as saying; “It’s a new Heritage and it’s one that’s not standing by the principles of Ronald Reagan. I’m puzzled why they came out with this study and I’m more puzzled why they seem to be against immigration.”
 

In a word, it’s a mess. Only four months on the job, former senator Jim DeMint, who came to Heritage with no scholarly credentials, is caught in a firestorm of Heritage’s own making. A backlash that tarnishes the report and anti-immigrant forces more generally may undermine opponents of the Gang of Eight. But to the extent it raises questions about whether Heritage is still a respected think tank (and not a political oppo center), DeMint will find himself under the gun. A conservative scholar at another think tank emailed me, “I just don’t understand why [former president Ed] Feulner among others did not see this disaster coming.” More conservatives will be asking the same thing, I imagine. [Read full article]


Via Coffee Party USA, Charles Lang
No comment yet.
Scooped by Michael Charney
Scoop.it!

IRS singling out of 'Tea Party' being investigated

IRS singling out of 'Tea Party' being investigated | The Middle Ground | Scoop.it

By Patrick Temple-West and Thomas Ferraro


(Reuters) - An investigation of the Internal Revenue Service was launched on Friday after a senior IRS official publicly apologized for subjecting conservative political groups to "inappropriate" scrutiny.

 

In a practice that drew complaints during the 2012 election campaign, groups with the words "Tea Party" or "patriots" in their names were flagged for closer IRS review when they applied to the agency for tax-exempt status.

"We would like to apologize for that," said Lois Lerner, director of the IRS tax-exempt office at an American Bar Association conference. She said the practice "was absolutely incorrect and it was inappropriate."

 

Lerner said screening of the conservative groups was "absolutely not" influenced by the Obama administration.

 

In what could be a major embarrassment for the IRS and a potential distraction for President Barack Obama, the matter is under investigation by the IRS inspector general.

 

"What we know of this is of concern and we certainly find the actions taken, as reported, to be inappropriate," White House spokesman Jay Carney said at a briefing.

 

Michael Charney's insight:

While I'm not a fan of Tea Party groups in general, if they were singled out for extra scrutiny, it's totally wrong, and should be investigated - MC

No comment yet.
Rescooped by Michael Charney from Coffee Party News
Scoop.it!

US Weighs Wide Overhaul of Wiretap Laws - New York Times

US Weighs Wide Overhaul of Wiretap Laws - New York Times | The Middle Ground | Scoop.it
US Weighs Wide Overhaul of Wiretap Laws New York Times WASHINGTON — The Obama administration, resolving years of internal debate, is on the verge of backing a Federal Bureau of Investigation plan for a sweeping overhaul of surveillance laws that...

Via Monica S Mcfeeters
Coffee Party USA's curator insight, May 10, 7:47 AM

Here is an issue both parties all too often seem to have no problem about standing together to achieve. How much and how to spy on citizens? In fairness this article seems to indicate in this current case this involves traditional court ordered wiretapping. Saudi Arabia has threatened to cut off Skype if they don't give them the codes to allow ease dropping that America and some other selected countries possess.

 

How and when to spy on individuals is a topic every citizen might want to pay attention to because it is our privacy and it is the message we send to the world on how to spy. The opportunity for abuse or misuse of spying technology matters in a democracy and those companies discussed that would be the major players in making all this happen are also major financial donors into the political process. 

Scooped by Michael Charney
Scoop.it!

The Ghost of Barbara Jordan

The Ghost of Barbara Jordan | The Middle Ground | Scoop.it

by W. JAMES ANTLE III (The American Conservative)


How different would the immigration debate look today had Barbara Jordan lived? It’s a question frequently pondered by those of us who believe the answer to every problem concerning immigration isn’t necessarily more immigration.


Jordan was the first woman elected to Congress from Texas and the first Southern black female ever elected to the House. She compiled a similar record of firsts in Texas state politics and was active in the civil rights movement. But Jordan capped her career chairing the U.S. Commission on Immigration Reform.


The commission’s vision of immigration reform was very different than the “comprehensive” variety pushed by a bipartisan gaggle of senators. To understand how different, consider Jordan’s contention in early 1995 congressional testimony that “deportation is crucial.”


“Credibility in immigration policy can be summed up in one sentence: those who should get in, get in; those who should be kept out, are kept out; and those who should not be here will be required to leave,” Jordan said. “The top priorities for detention and removal, of course, are criminal aliens. But for the system to be credible, people actually have to be deported at the end of the process.”   MORE


No comment yet.
Scooped by Michael Charney
Scoop.it!

5 things We Learned from Sanford's Win (with Video)

5 things We Learned from Sanford's Win (with Video) | The Middle Ground | Scoop.it

By Paul Steinhauser and Jim Acosta, CNN


Mark Sanfordis heading back to Washington after detours along the Appalachian Trail and Argentina.

The former South Carolina governor finished his second term in office three years ago with his political career dead in the water thanks to a well-publicized extra-marital affair and ethics violations. But he came away Tuesday with a victory over Democratic opponent Elizabeth Colbert Busch in the special election for a vacant House seat in the Palmetto State's 1st Congressional District -- the same seat he once held.

Here's what we've learned, or better yet, re-learned, from Sanford's victory


1. Voters give politicians second chances

From the start of his bid for Congress, Sanford was vey open on the campaign trail about the affair and made it the subject of his first TV ad. Sanford asked for, and received, political redemption from the voters.... read the full list HERE


No comment yet.
Scooped by Michael Charney
Scoop.it!

Faith leaders promote civility in Washington

Faith leaders promote civility in Washington | The Middle Ground | Scoop.it

by MAUREEN FIEDLER (National Catholic Reporter)



Well, if faith leaders can do it -- actually promote civility in Washington, D.C. -- they will have worked a miracle that rivals those recorded in the Gospels.


Apparently, some are trying. Recently, the nonpartisan Faith and Politics Institute sponsored a two-day conversation among faith groups, "Faith, Politics and Our Better Angels: A Christian Dialogue to Promote Civility."

According to Religion News Service, 25 religious leaders came together with the goal of promoting civil discourse. The meeting included both ends of the political/religious spectrum: Kenda Bartlett, executive director of Concerned Women for America; the Rev. Jeffery Cooper, general secretary of the African Methodist Episcopal Church; Barrett Duke of the Southern Baptist Convention's Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission; Sr. Marge Clark of NETWORK, a Catholic social justice lobby; and others.


Also present was Bishop Katharine Jefferts Schori, presiding bishop of the U.S. Episcopal church. She told the media, "Faith leaders have a remarkable opportunity to shift the conversation, but it's very challenging, particularly in a larger society that wants to understand everything as a battle, as engaging the enemy, rather than with someone who might have something to teach us."


They are reportedly considering the institution of a national day of civil discourse to promote the idea and encourage preaching on the topic.


While I'm glad to see this, much more is needed. Right now, nothing of substance is getting done in Washington. There is also a stubborn inability to come together for the benefit of the American people. I can remember when conservative Ronald Reagan and liberal Tip O'Neill bridged wide gaps to reform Social Security. That day is long gone.


So words are a start. But we need to move beyond civil rhetoric to civil action and legislation.



No comment yet.
Scooped by Michael Charney
Scoop.it!

Arizona House OKs religious-protection measure

Arizona House OKs religious-protection measure | The Middle Ground | Scoop.it
By Alia Beard Rau The Republic 

Supporters of a bill that would change the state’s religious-protection law say it would strengthen Arizonans’ ability to defend their “practice or observance of religion.”


But critics of the legislation, particularly in the gay and transgender community, say it’s so broadly worded that it could have dangerous implications, particularly in providing a legal defense for those who ignore state law or city ordinances meant to protect groups such as same-sex couples and transgender individuals from discrimination.


The Arizona House on Wednesday passed Senate Bill 1178 in a 32-24 vote, with most Republicans supporting it and all Democrats opposing it. The bill still needs final Senate approval before going to the governor. The Senate has not yet scheduled a vote.


The conservative advocacy group Center for Arizona Policy authored the bill. Its attorney says the bill does not expand the definition of exercise of religion in a way that adds new protections. Rather, the group contends it clarifies an individual’s right to make a legal argument by allowing him or her to claim in lawsuits that a state action is a burden on a religious exercise, even when the government is not a party.


“It is shocking the claims that have been made about what this bill does,” said Josh Kredit, legislative counsel for the Center for Arizona Policy. “We just want to clarify the state law.”   MORE


Greg Russak's comment, May 17, 9:07 PM
Wish I could say I'm surprised, but nothing the AZ GOP does surprises anymore.
Scooped by Michael Charney
Scoop.it!

BREAKING: U.S. jobless claims jump to six-week high Economic Report

BREAKING: U.S. jobless claims jump to six-week high  Economic Report | The Middle Ground | Scoop.it

Initial jobless claims climbed by 32,000 to a seasonally adjusted 360,000 in the week ended May 11, the Labor Department said Thursday. Economists surveyed by MarketWatch had expected claims to rise to 330,000 from a revised 328,000 in the prior week....


The level of weekly claims has been particularly volatile over the past two months, ranging from a high of 388,000 to a low of 327,000. That’s why economists pay closer attention to the more stable four-week average, which rose a by a much smaller 1,250 to 339,250 and remained near a five-year low.


In other words, the labor market is not getting much better but it’s not getting any worse. Claims are viewed as a good barometer of how many layoffs are occurring in the economy. Yet the link between claims and new hiring is far less precise. Although companies are eliminating fewer jobs, they are not hiring as many people as they were at the start of the year.



No comment yet.
Scooped by Michael Charney
Scoop.it!

BREAKING: U.S. wholesale prices fall sharply in April Economic Report

BREAKING: U.S. wholesale prices fall sharply in April Economic Report | The Middle Ground | Scoop.it

In April, the cost of fuel fell 2.5%, led by a 6.0% drop in gasoline prices. Electricity and home-heating-fuel costs also eased, though natural-gas prices posted the biggest increase since mid-2008.


The price of food, meanwhile, fell 0.8% in April after jumping by the same amount in March. Vegetable prices plunged 10.6%, with the cost of squash, lettuce, celery and cucumbers all taking a dive. Meat prices also fell.  MORE

No comment yet.
Scooped by Michael Charney
Scoop.it!

Minority report: 3 big trends in the Census Bureau's voting data

Minority report: 3 big trends in the Census Bureau's voting data | The Middle Ground | Scoop.it

By Husna Haq (Christian Science Monitor)


If you had any doubts, it’s now official: When it comes to minorities, the GOP is not rocking the vote. That’s according to new data from the US Census Bureau, released Wednesday, that shows that record levels of black voters, as well rising numbers of minority voters, are turning out at the polls just as the white vote is declining. Unless Republicans can change their batting average with minorities, the data suggest they could strike out of office in future elections by dint of sheer demographics.


As Allan Lichtman, a presidential historian at American University in Washington, earlier told the Monitor, “the GOP [is] on the wrong side of history, demographically speaking.”


But fear not, Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus, all is not lost for the Grand Old Party. While the data show overwhelming support for President Obama among black and other minority voters in 2012, opportunities still exist for Republicans in two major voting cohorts, ones that will swell in coming years, to boot: the Hispanic and youth vote.


MORE


No comment yet.
Scooped by Michael Charney
Scoop.it!

Bloomberg editor-in-chief: What we did and didn’t know

Bloomberg editor-in-chief: What we did and didn’t know | The Middle Ground | Scoop.it

As speculation continues about the so-called terminal snooping saga,  Bloomberg’s editor-in-chief Matthew Winkler weighed in on Monday with an editorial first apologizing, then explaining what reporters do and don’t have access to:


“First, they could see a user’s login history and when a login was created. Second, they could see high-level types of user functions on an aggregated basis, with no ability to look into specific security information. This is akin to being able to see how many times someone used Microsoft Word vs. Excel. And, finally, they could see information about help desk inquiries,” said Winkler.


Winkler says the practice is as old as the news and data provider itself, “as our reporters used to go in the early days of the company and ask them what topics they wanted to see covered … We still do that today, which is why we have feedback tabs on our news-related terminal functions.”


The saga began for Bloomberg after Goldman Sachs last month complained about journalist access to terminal subscribers,  prompting the company to restrict that access.  Its disclosure about the curb triggered an inquiry from the Federal Reserve and the Treasury, which both have Bloomberg terminals, The Wall Street Journal said. Chief Executive Daniel Doctoroff told The WSJ in an interview on Sunday said that the newsroom access to that information should have been “eliminated” earlier.


The New York Times on Monday cited more than half-a-dozen former employees who said they were trained to use a function on those terminals that let them monitor login activity in order to advance news coverage. But Winkler said Bloomberg has “never compromised the integrity” of its customer data in its reporting:


At no time did reporters have access to trading, portfolio, monitor, blotter or other related systems. Nor did they have access to clients’ messages to one another. They couldn’t see the stories that clients were reading or the securities clients might be looking at.


The topic certainly got lots of tongues wagging on Twitter Monday.


No comment yet.
Scooped by Michael Charney
Scoop.it!

Dispatch from Cairo: The frighteningly uncertain future of Christians in Egypt

Dispatch from Cairo: The frighteningly uncertain future of Christians in Egypt | The Middle Ground | Scoop.it

by JACOB LIPPINCOTT (The Week)


Christians and Muslims generally live side by side peacefully. But there has been a troubling rise in religious violence....


Coptic Easter has come and gone. For arcane reasons, Copts, the Christian sect indigenous to Egypt, celebrate the holiday on a different date than western Christians, and last Sunday they did so in the typical Egyptian fashion. Coptic youth set off fusillades of fireworks around churches and Coptic and Muslim families shopped and ate late into the night.


Despite the revelry, this is a particularly uncertain time for Copts and other religious minorities living in Egypt.


The country has recently seen numerous deadly sectarian clashes between Copts and Muslims, including a particularly galling incident in April in which police and Muslim youth attempted to storm the main Coptic Cathedral in Cairo with guns and tear gas, eventually killing at least two Copts.


Amidst this growing violence, the powerful Muslim Brotherhood, which unofficially controls the ruling Freedom and Justice Party, issued a religious edict banning Muslims from wishing their Egyptian neighbors a happy Easter. MORE

No comment yet.
Scooped by Michael Charney
Scoop.it!

NYC Study Finds Protected Bicycle Lanes Boost Local Business

NYC Study Finds Protected Bicycle Lanes Boost Local Business | The Middle Ground | Scoop.it
by Mary Lauran Hall (AmericaBikes.org)

The road to recovery is in sight, and it has a bike lane. 

The typical city street is a busy place. People riding bikes, walking, driving cars, and operating buses all have somewhere to to go and want to get there safely — and quickly. 

But while we normally think of streets as pipelines for people and goods, public streets are about more than just moving from point A to point B. They're also corridors for public life. Streets are places where locals discover new hole-in-the-wall stores and restaurants, where window shoppers duck into shops to peruse, and where children convince their parents to stop — just for ONE second — to buy a cup of hot chocolate.


In other words, streets can also grow local economies.


A new study from the New York Department of Transportation shows that streets that safely accommodate bicycle and pedestrian travel are especially good at boosting small businesses, even in a recession. 


NYC DOT found that protected bikeways had a significant positive impact on local business strength. After the construction of a protected bicycle lane on 9th Avenue, local businesses saw a 49% increase in retail sales. In comparison, local businesses throughout Manhattan only saw a 3% increase in retail sales.


Michael Charney's insight:

Interesting study from last November just crossed my desk... MC

No comment yet.
Rescooped by Michael Charney from Election by Actual (Not Fictional) People
Scoop.it!

The Myth of Presidential Leadership

The Myth of Presidential Leadership | The Middle Ground | Scoop.it

by NORM ORNSTEIN (National Journal)


The theme of presidential leadership is a venerated one in America, the subject of many biographies and an enduring mythology about great figures rising to the occasion. The term “mythology” doesn’t mean that the stories are inaccurate; Lincoln, the wonderful Steven Spielberg movie, conveyed a real sense of that president’s remarkable character and drive, as well as his ability to shape important events. Every president is compared to the Lincoln leadership standard and to those set by other presidents, and the first 100 days of every term becomes a measure of how a president is doing.


I have been struck by this phenomenon a lot recently, because at nearly every speech I give, someone asks about President Obama’s failure to lead. Of course, that question has been driven largely by the media, perhaps most by Bob Woodward. When Woodward speaks, Washington listens, and he has pushed the idea that Obama has failed in his fundamental leadership task—not building relationships with key congressional leaders the way Bill Clinton did, and not “working his will” the way LBJ or Ronald Reagan did.  MORE



Via Daniel Mayeda
Daniel Mayeda's curator insight, May 10, 12:58 PM

Excellent analysis drawn from recent history. 

Scooped by Michael Charney
Scoop.it!

A conservative defense of government

A conservative defense of government | The Middle Ground | Scoop.it

by MATT K. LEWIS (The Week)


Everyone knows that Ronald Reagan famously said, "Government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem." But as Ramesh Ponnuru recently pointed out, there is a "less famous yet crucial beginning of that sentence": "In our present crisis."


Conservatives rightly hate nanny-state government and big-spending bureaucracy. But too often, the word "government" has become unfair shorthand for what is actually only bad or oppressive government. 


Conservatives aren't anarchists, after all. We don't want Big Brother, but none of us should want to live in a Hobbesian state where every person is absolutely and entirely for himself, either. Instead, we believe in ordered liberty via limited government.


Certainly, the size and scope of government has increased over the years. But still, we shouldn't conflate all government with bad government. We need a functioning state, and yes, there is such a thing as a government that is too weak.


MORE


No comment yet.
Scooped by Michael Charney
Scoop.it!

Sanford's Strong Fiscal Conservative Views Worry Boehner

Sanford's Strong Fiscal Conservative Views Worry Boehner | The Middle Ground | Scoop.it

by JASON PYE (United Liberty)


Speaker John Boehner and Republican leaders in the House are apparently worried about Rep.-elect Mark Sanford (R-SC):


"Boehner on Tuesday morning suggested that he was less than thrilled about Sanford’s potential return to the House. And while the Speaker tweeted out a quick “congrats” to Sanford with the hash-tag jobs, a comment from his spokesman following the results was less than a bear-hug.


[…]


“He could be an added voice to the opposition — to those who like to make trouble for the Republican leadership,” GOP strategist Ron Bonjean, a former top House leadership aide, told The Hill. “It’ll definitely be a leadership management issue.”


Sanford made it clear in Tuesday night’s victory speech that he wasn’t returning to Washington to make friends — the same approach he took when he was a thorn in the side of GOP leadership during his first stint in Congress in the 1990s, and when he fought tooth-and-nail with the Republican-controlled statehouse during his governorship.


The newly elected congressman said voters had sent a “message to Washington, D.C., and a messenger to Washington, D.C., on the importance on changing things in that fair city.”


Boehner has since reached out to Sanford in an attempt to “make nice,” as Politico described it. And while it’s never too late to mend fences, Sanford built a reputation as an outspoken fiscal conservative during his previous three terms in the House. Additionally, the fact the National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC) recently spurned him could provide even more of an incentive for an already independent-minded Sanford fall in line when GOP leaders decide to deviate from fiscally conservative principles.


No comment yet.
Scooped by Michael Charney
Scoop.it!

Immigration bill backers thwart conservative amendments

Immigration bill backers thwart conservative amendments | The Middle Ground | Scoop.it

By Richard Cowan and Thomas Ferraro (Reuters)



(Reuters) - A landmark bill backed by U.S. President Barack Obama to overhaul the nation's immigration system survived unscathed on Thursday during the first day of consideration by a divided Senate Judiciary Committee.


On bipartisan votes, the panel rejected conservatives' attempts to thwart implementation of a centerpiece of the bill - a pathway to U.S. citizenship for millions of undocumented immigrants.


By day's end leading Democratic and Republican senators said the committee had improved the bill.


The panel, composed of 10 Democrats and eight Republicans, accepted 21 relatively modest amendments that focus largely on border security and increased congressional oversight. All but one amendment were agreed to on bipartisan votes.


Eleven other amendments were rejected or withdrawn, many of them Republican bids to bolster border security in ways that went far beyond the steps spelled out in the bill, while also delaying or even killing proposals to legalize undocumented immigrants.


"It is a better bill now than it was this morning," said Republican Senator Jeff Flake of Arizona, a member of the committee and the Gang of Eight senators who wrote the measure.


Democratic Senator Charles Schumer of New York, another committee and Gang of Eight member agreed, hailing the amendments as "good-faith improvements...that make our proposal stronger."

MORE


No comment yet.